||Technology in Australia 1788-1988
Table of Contents
II The Australian Chemical Industry
IV Chemists In Other Industries
V The Dawn Of Modern Chemical Industry - High Pressure Synthesis
VI The Growth Of Synthetic Chemicals - Concentration, Rationalisation And International Links
VII Australian Industrial Chemical Research Laboratories
VIII The Plastics Industry
i Plastics processing
ii Phenol - basis of the first plastic
iii Plastics - the first generation
iv Plastics - the second generation - from petrochemicals
v Styrene monomer - the West Footscray petrochemical complex
vi The Botany petrochemical complex
vii The petrochemical complex at Altona
viii CSR - from sugar alcohol to petrochemical OXO alcohol
IX The Paint Industry
Plastics - the second generation - from petrochemicalsAlthough polystyrene, PVC and polythene were produced in Australia in the late fifties, the supply of intermediates was limited and based on imported or obsolescing processes. It was Monsanto which launched the petrochemical industry in Australia with its first styrene monomer plant in 1961 and the long struggle of pioneering an entirely new process.
The dramatic growth of the chemical industry was fuelled in the main by petroleum and the new technologies of the petrochemical industry. The industry had its origins in the US, where cheap natural gas, the thermal cracking of natural gas liquids and catalytic cracking in refineries contributed abundant raw material supplies, particularly olefins. By the early 1950s the industry was taking root in Europe, with the emphasis there on naphtha cracking, as Europe lacked the natural gas liquids. It did, however, have adequate naphtha from the new refineries constructed principally to satisfy the growing demand for fuel oil.
Australia at that time had neither petroleum resources nor a significant crude oil refining industry, although limited processing of oil fractions was carried out in small units such as that operated by Bitumen Oil Refineries (Australia) Ltd. ('Boral', now Boral Ltd) at Matraville, NSW. Expansion-minded Australian manufacturers of chemicals looked enviously at the raw materials available on the other side of the globe, meanwhile exploring the limited alternative possibilities for manufacturing them here. The key intermediate was ethylene which, being a gas, could not be transported economically to Australia. As early as 1948, Timbrol Ltd. had constructed a pilot plant for the manufacture of ethylene glycol by the chlorhydrin route. Ethylene was obtained by the catalytic dehydration of alcohol (ethanol), a fermentation product in abundant supply from the Queensland sugar industry. The Timbrol plant operated successfully but was never scaled up as under most circumstances the cost of ethanol makes it uneconomic. Indeed the reverse, the synthesis of ethanol by the hydration of ethylene is the industrial norm. Australia's problem was to find a cheaper route to ethylene in the face of limited outlets. Petrochemical ethylene plants are complicated and expensive, particularly the low temperature distillation step necessary to separate the compounds with one and two carbon atoms in the cracked gas stream. Consequently product cost is extremely scale-sensitive. Three different approaches to this problem were tried.
Organisations in Australian Science at Work - Bitumen Oil Refineries (Australia) Ltd (B.O.R.A.L.); Boral; Monsanto Australia; Petroleum and Chemical Corporation (Australia) Ltd (P.A.C.C.A.L.); Shell Co. of Australia; Timbrol Ltd
© 1988 Print Edition pages 698 - 699, Online Edition 2000
Published by Australian Science and Technology Heritage Centre, using the Web Academic Resource Publisher